Reporters will do their best to try to translate this moment. “Hopefully the press can fill in, but it just won’t be the same.” The visual aids can be particularly “critical when you’ve got two entirely different stories from both sides,” says Tobias. “There’s something lost” when the public can’t see the trial, Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, says. “All the in-room narrative reporting in the world can’t measure up to an actual audio-visual feed-the imagery-of a witness on the stand,” says Honig, who pointed to the way images from trials like that of Derek Chauvin over George Floyd’s murder have been cemented in the public consciousness. Davis has not expressly ruled on that request, but said during a pretrial hearing Thursday, as the Associated Press reported, that he’d “gone as far as I can go with response to access,” and, signaling the Delaware Superior court’s traditionally restrictive rules over public access, that the outlets were “getting the most access of any media in a Superior Court case in Delaware.” Fox’s lawyers filed an opposition brief to the media outlets’ letter, which, in a statement to Vanity Fair, Fox called “an 11th hour request that risks compromising the integrity of the trial proceedings.” Dominion Voting Systems declined to comment. A group of media outlets, including the Times, CBS, ABC, NBC, and ProPublica, wrote to Judge Eric Davis seeking to record the audio stream of the trial, and to use excerpts of those recordings in their news programming. Not only will the trial not be televised, the court has banned any recording or rebroadcasting of the audio feed-hampering outlets’ abilities to playback the proceedings on the radio or TV. “You can’t tell who’s talking half the time, especially when the lawyers start arguing a point, or you come into the testimony part way through,” he said. Grueskin recalls his experience listening to the audio line for Sarah Palin’s defamation case against The New York Times last year. “It’s better than nothing, but it’s not much better,” says Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin. The only way Americans will be able to know what’s going on inside the courtroom-outside of getting one of the roughly 200 seats available in the courtroom-will be by calling into an audio line provided by the court. Except, unless you’ve made the trip to Wilmington, Delaware, and managed to get a seat in the courtroom, you can’t. Some of the network’s top stars, like Tucker Carlson, are also expected to take the stand. chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan Murdoch will be forced to answer for the outlet’s democracy-damaging coverage in a public setting. It could be the only time the likes of Fox Corp. ![]() ![]() The verdict will decide whether Fox News will be held accountable for spreading 2020 election lies-conspiracies that were fundamental to Donald Trump’s Big Lie. The trial for Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation suit against Fox News, which legal experts are calling the most consequential defamation lawsuit in decades, is set to start Monday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |